Buffett Spared, But Others Not in Mart Suit

  Print Print

August 6, 2010 by   Comments Off on Buffett Spared, But Others Not in Mart Suit

Warren Buffett was spared from giving a deposition in the lawsuit brought by a former executive who said he was wrongly dismissed by the recreational vehicle unit of the billionaire’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Bloomberg reported

As first reported on Wednesday (Aug. 4) by, U.S. Magistrate Judge Christopher Nuechterlein in South Bend, Ind., made the ruling Aug. 2 and said Berkshire CFO Marc Hamburg may be questioned by lawyers for the plaintiff, Brad Mart.

Mart said he was fired from the Elkhart, Ind.-based Forest River Inc. after bringing allegations of fraud to executives, including to Buffett in six phone conversations. Mart had requested Buffett’s deposition to combat Omaha, Neb.-based Berkshire’s claim that it should be dropped from the lawsuit for lack of jurisdiction.

“Even Mart’s own recount of the conversations reveal that Buffett communicated that he did not get involved in personnel matters and that Mart should seek an audience elsewhere for relief,” the judge wrote.

Buffett, Berkshire’s CEO, isn’t accused of wrongdoing. His deposition was requested to help determine facts of the case. Buffett didn’t respond to an e-mailed request for comment sent to an assistant.

Berkshire, the parent company, doesn’t do business in Indiana and shouldn’t be subject to courts in that state, it said in the June 1 request for dismissal. Mart said Berkshire’s control over Forest River submits the firm to Indiana law and Buffett’s statements could help show that.


Hamburg’s deposition was requested by Mart “to probe the full extent of the parent-subsidiary relationship,” Nuechterlein said. “The court considers it appropriate to grant Mart’s request.”

Berkshire had previously offered a deposition with Hamburg in exchange for Mart’s renouncing his request for depositions of other executives including Buffett.

Buffett, 79, bought Forest River in 2005 and left its CEO, Peter Liegl, in charge of the unit. Mart, who helped arrange the $800 million sale to Berkshire, was fired last year after he went to Buffett and accused Liegl of fraud, according to the April complaint. Liegl’s lawyer, Jeanine Gozdecki of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, denied the charges and is seeking a dismissal.

Liegl required Forest River to buy parts at inflated prices from a company he owned and appropriated cash from factory vending machines, Mart said. Liegl also reneged on a promise to make Mart CEO, according to the complaint. Mart alleged in the suit that Liegl threatened his life.


“There is no legitimate basis to the allegations of the threats or the fraud,” Gozdecki said last month. “We will vigorously defend these claims on behalf of the company and on behalf of Pete Liegl.”

Mart’s request to depose Jeff Rowe, Forest River’s director of human resources, was granted by the judge. An application to question Forrest Krutter, Berkshire’s secretary, was denied.

“It appears that this request is more likely to lead to an impermissible fishing expedition than targeted, jurisdictional discovery,” Nuechterlein said of the request to depose Krutter.

Krutter had no comment. Stephen Kennedy, a lawyer for Mart, declined through an assistant to comment.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [Facebook] [Google] [StumbleUpon]


Comments are closed.